WARNINGGTFS Schedule notice

Two routes have indistinguishable names

duplicate_route_name
Severity
WARNING
Files to check
1
Report fields
8
Documentation
Curated

Diagnosis

What this notice means

Routes for the same agency and transport type share the same short-name and long-name combination.

Operational effect

Why it matters

Passengers may have difficulty choosing the intended route.

Scope

Files to check and report fields

Report fieldTypeMeaning
agencyIdstringCommon `routes.agency_id`.
csvRowNumber1integerThe row number of the first occurrence.
csvRowNumber2integerThe row number of the other occurrence.
routeId1stringThe id of the the first occurrence.
routeId2stringThe id of the the other occurrence.
routeLongNamenumberCommon `routes.route_long_name`.
routeShortNamestringCommon `routes.route_short_name`.
routeTypeValuestringCommon `routes.route_type`.

Repair

How to fix it

  1. 1

    Compare the reported routes with the operator's public route names.

  2. 2

    Merge accidental duplicates and update trips, or use genuinely distinct public names. Opposite directions normally belong to one route. Keep legitimate identical names when the real services require them.

  3. 3
    Check the result

    After a repair, rebuild the archive and validate it again. Confirm that the affected records are correct and that no new related notices appeared. A reviewed warning or informational notice may remain when it describes intentional, supported data.

Re-check your feed in the browserFree, no upload for a file you pick.

Sources

References